You already have agents. The missing piece is making them behave like a fleet instead of a pile of concurrent writers.
Try it. See a coordinated fleet run in the main demo, then compare merge outcomes in merge-replay and caller breakage in semantic impact.
More. Start with the territory map, dig into leases (episode 1), and skim the docs for managent run and MCP hooks.
Meet teams where they already work
Managent is not asking you to abandon Cursor, Claude, Codex, Copilot, or your CI agents. It sits underneath them as shared coordination: territory, leases, and verification that every harness can respect — laptop session or headless job.
The control plane in three moves
First, agents (or the CLI that wraps them) request exclusive leases on the paths they intend to edit. Second, the territory map makes those claims visible to the rest of the fleet so idle workers pick open work instead of stomping hot files. Third, merge-replay verification runs git merge-tree against overlapping branches so “leased” does not get confused with “will land cleanly.”
Scope prediction is opt-in and advisory: it suggests likely scopes from task text so agents claim the right territory faster. It never silently expands a lease and never replaces the grant loop.
Reliability means turn-taking first
“Reliable” for agent fleets is not uptime theater. It is the boring, essential property that two writers do not edit the same lines at the same time — and that merge-replay still checks whether sibling branches would collide. Leases serialize intent; verification keeps the merge gate honest. That is the bar we optimize for.
Real codebases, not toy repos
Marketing demos love clean sample apps. Platform teams live in monorepos with generated lockfiles, half-migrated packages, and release trains that never stop. Managent is built for that world: exclusive claims on the paths that matter, visible waits everywhere else, and fail-closed merge-tree checks when the lease was not enough.
Wire it without rewriting the fleet
The practical path is a thin wrap: managent run acquires a lease, heartbeats while the harness works, and releases on exit. MCP and hooks plug the same protocol into interactive sessions and git workflows. Enforcement can start advisory and tighten as your org is ready — the coordination contract stays the same.
What to try
- Replay a with/without run on the coordination demo and note where waits replace stomps.
- Use merge-replay to inspect a lease-clean change that still fails against co-active branches.
- Check semantic impact for breakage that path ownership alone does not catch.
- Skim CI fleets or monorepos if that is your deployment shape.
Humans stay in control
Coordination is not autonomy cosplay. Owners set policy. Reviewers keep the merge gate. Agents get clear lanes. The control plane makes waiting and ownership visible so people can intervene when something looks wrong — before it becomes a weekend incident.
What comes next
Early access is open for teams already running multi-agent workflows and feeling the collision tax. If that is you, join the waitlist — we would rather debug your fleet than another synthetic benchmark. Read the research notes for why concurrent agent PRs already conflict at measurable rates.
Ready to coordinate your fleet?
